Prime Minister Narendra Modi issued a stark warning during his recent meeting with UK counterpart Keir Starmer: the growing threat of Khalistani extremism cannot be ignored. This bold statement came during wide-ranging talks aimed at strengthening India-UK ties in trade, defense, and technology. But here's where it gets controversial: PM Modi urged Starmer to take decisive action against pro-Khalistan elements operating within the UK, emphasizing that violent extremism must not be allowed to exploit the very freedoms democratic societies cherish.
During a press briefing, Ministry of External Affairs Secretary Vikram Misri elaborated on the discussion. He highlighted PM Modi's stance that radicalism and violent extremism have no place in democracies and should be countered within the legal frameworks of both nations. This issue has gained urgency following the March 2023 attack on the Indian High Commission in London, which underscored India's growing concerns about pro-Khalistan activities in the UK.
And this is the part most people miss: while the meeting focused on economic and strategic partnerships—including a landmark free trade agreement expected to double bilateral trade by 2030—the Khalistan issue emerged as a critical point of contention. Starmer's visit, accompanied by 125 prominent UK business and education leaders, aimed to deepen cooperation, but the shadow of extremism loomed large.
Is it enough to address violent extremism solely within legal frameworks? This question sparks debate. While PM Modi advocates for a legal approach, some argue that broader societal and diplomatic measures are needed. What do you think? Should the UK take more proactive steps to curb pro-Khalistan activities, or is the current legal framework sufficient? Share your thoughts in the comments—this is a conversation that demands diverse perspectives.
